JOINT ANALYSIS OF CLUSTER OBSERVATIONS. II. CHANDRA/XMM-NEWTON X-RAY AND WEAK LENSING SCALING RELATIONS FOR A SAMPLE OF 50 RICH CLUSTERS OF GALAXIES
By A. Mahdavi, H. Hoekstra, Arif Babul, C. Bildfell, Tesla E. Jeltema, J. Henry. 2012
190 citations recorded by the source corpus.
We present a study of multiwavelength X-ray and weak lensing scaling relations for a sample of 50 clusters of galaxies. Our analysis combines Chandra and XMM-Newton data using an energy-dependent cross-calibration. After considering a number of scaling relations, we find that gas mass is the most robust estimator of weak lensing mass, yielding 15% ± 6% intrinsic scatter at (the pseudo-pressure YX yields a consistent scatter of 22% ± 5%). The scatter does not change when measured within a fixed physical radius of 1 Mpc. Clusters with small brightest cluster galaxy (BCG) to X-ray peak offsets constitute a very regular population whose members have the same gas mass fractions and whose even smaller (<10%) deviations from regularity can be ascribed to line of sight geometrical effects alone. Cool-core clusters, while a somewhat different population, also show the same (<10%) scatter in the gas mass–lensing mass relation. There is a good correlation and a hint of bimodality in the plane defined by BCG offset and central entropy (or central cooling time). The pseudo-pressure YX does not discriminate between the more relaxed and less relaxed populations, making it perhaps the more even-handed mass proxy for surveys. Overall, hydrostatic masses underestimate weak lensing masses by 10% on the average at ; but cool-core clusters are consistent with no bias, while non-cool-core clusters have a large and constant 15%–20% bias between and , in agreement with N-body simulations incorporating unthermalized gas. For non-cool-core clusters, the bias correlates well with BCG ellipticity. We also examine centroid shift variance and power ratios to quantify substructure; these quantities do not correlate with residuals in the scaling relations. Individual clusters have for the most part forgotten the source of their departures from self-similarity.
Subfields: Astronomy and Astrophysics, Instrumentation
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/44073c161a30c180379157ed9ef96db1a52068c2
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Astronomy and Astrophysics
- Andrey V. Kravtsov
- Volker Springel
- Simon D. M. White
- Risa Wechsler
- L. Hernquist
- S. Allen
- C. Conroy
- M. White
In Instrumentation
- Andrey V. Kravtsov
- Risa Wechsler
- S. Allen
- Simon D. M. White
- A. Mantz
- Volker Springel
- M. White
- August E. Evrard
Citations in the corpus
- The Atacama Cosmology Telescope: Sunyaev-Zel'dovich selected galaxy clusters at 148 GHz from three seasons of data (2013, background): “For example, Mahdavi et al. (2013) find that hydrostatic masses are lower than weak lensing masses by about 10% atR500; Zhang et al. (2010) and Vikhlinin et al. (2009a) find reasonable agreement; while Planck Collaboration et al. (2013) find hydrostatic masses to be about 20% larger than weak…”
- Weighing the Giants – III. Methods and measurements of accurate galaxy cluster weak-lensing masses (2012, background): “However, the authors adopt mass-apertur measurements for their multiwavelength comparisons in Hoekstra (2007); Mahdavi et al. (2008); Hoekstra et al. (2012); Mahdavi et al.(2013).”
- GALAXY CLUSTER BARYON FRACTIONS REVISITED (2013, background): “Mahdavi et al. (2013) meanwhile find that, for their full sample, the X-ray masses are low by 12% relative to lensing, but with the cool-core systems having larger relative X-ray masses.”
- redMaPPer. I. ALGORITHM AND SDSS DR8 CATALOG (2013, background): “We assume every galaxy cluster halo has a bright, dominant galaxy residing at its center (e.g., von der Linden et al. 2007, 2012; Menanteau et al. 2013; Mahdavi et al. 2012; Song et al. 2012b; Stott et al. 2012, see also paper II).”
- Planck 2013 results. XX. Cosmology from Sunyaev-Zeldovich cluster counts (2013, background): “Most recent work points to relatively good agreement between X-ray and WL masses, with MHE/MWL ' 0.9 on average, and MHE/MWL ' 1 for relaxed systems (Mahdavi et al. 2013; von der Linden et al. 2014).”