Farmers’ intrinsic motivations, barriers to the adoption of conservation practices and effectiveness of policy instruments: Empirical evidence from northern Australia

By Romy Greiner, D. Gregg. 2011

396 citations recorded by the source corpus.

The rate and extent of adoption of conservation practices by farmers is influenced, in principle, by characteristics of the practices and those of the farmers. Governments use policy instruments to increase the rate of adoption of practices which generate public benefits if it is deemed that privately optimal adoption rates will not lead to publicly optimal conservation outcomes. Recent nation-wide conservation programs in Australia have attracted criticism for low levels of effectiveness and efficiency. Could it be that program design has ignored key adoption factors, in particular characteristics of the target audience? If adoption is subject to personal factors, such as the motivations for farming, then it is likely that so are farmers’ responses to policy approaches and instruments. In this case study, surveys were conducted of farmers in three regions within the tropical savannas of northern Australia, where land-use systems are characterized by large-scale broad-acre beef grazing enterprises. Inter alia, these surveys collected data on graziers’ motivations, impediments to adoption of conservation practices, and perceived effectiveness of policy instruments in overcoming impediments. The research found that graziers had a very high level of conservation and lifestyle motivation and were motivated to lesser extents by financial/economic and social considerations, pointing to a strong stewardship ethic of graziers, or altruistic motif. Motivational profiles were significantly correlated with farmers’ perceptions about what constrained them from implementing conservation based management systems. Motivational profiles also explained differences in farmers’ perceptions of and stated propensity to interact with policy instruments, particularly at a regional scale and in the context of historical government interventions. On the basis of the empirical evidence presented, governments would be well advised to harness the diverse set of aspirations and motivations of farmers when designing conservation programs rather than. In particular, conservation programs need to take advantage of farmers’ stewardship ethic for maximum effectiveness and efficiency, and minimize the risk of crowding out intrinsic motivation and altruistic behaviours.

Subfields: Forestry, General Agricultural and Biological Sciences, Global and Planetary Change

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/43f057bd43792aaa6fcaceddcd60cf80d03d8d7d

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Forestry

In General Agricultural and Biological Sciences

In Global and Planetary Change

Citations in the corpus

Farmer’s intended and actual adoption of climate change mitigation and adaptation strategies (2016, background): “Others have looked broadly at conservation practices in agriculture (Reimer et al. 2013; Greiner and Gregg 2011; Delgado and Bausch 2005; Fuglie and Kascak 2001).”
Leverage Points for Governing Agricultural Soils: A Review of Empirical Studies of European Farmers’ Decision-Making (2018, methodology): “Similar frameworks in a related context can be found for example in Greiner and Gregg’s [32] study on the adoption of”
Diverse Approaches to Herbicide-Resistant Weed Management (2016, background): “Any government programs should consider farmer stewardship ethics and their concern for the environment as well as addressing profitability (Greiner and Gregg 2011).”
Payments for Environmental Services and Motivation Crowding: Towards a Conceptual Framework (2019, background): “First, it includes an additional psychological moderator that we call ‘environmental relatedness’ (table 1), which accounts for the human feeling of belonging to a natural setting or landscape (d’Adda, 2011; Greiner and Gregg, 2011; Fisher, 2012).”
Motivation crowding by economic incentives in conservation policy: A review of the empirical evidence (2015, background): “A survey conducted by Greiner and Gregg (2011) indicates that Australian farmers have multiple motivations for conservation, including intrinsic Please cite this article as: Rode, J., et al., Motivation crowding by economic Ecol.”
Adoption of climate‐smart agriculture among smallholder farmers: Does farmer entrepreneurship matter? (2021, background): “The last issue (the why) relates to the farmer’s intrinsic motivation to adopt new farming technologies (Greiner and Gregg, 2011).”