Live fences, isolated trees, and windbreaks: tools for conserving biodiversity in fragmented tropical landscapes.
By C. Harvey, N. Tucker, A. Estrada, G. Schroth, Gustavo A. B. da Fonseca, C. Gascon, Heraldo L. Vasconcelos, A. Izac. 2004
92 citations recorded by the source corpus.
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/43e90e7da5637c148bd1640b574c843d78c1beb7
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
- J. Metzger
- Milton Cezar Ribeiro
- J. Fischer
- David B. Lindenmayer
- A. C. Martensen
- M. Tabarelli
- Marie-Josée Fortin
- A. Manning
Citations in the corpus
- Spatial ecology and conservation of two sloth species in a cacao landscape in limón, Costa Rica (2007, background): “Harvey et al. (2004, 2005b) suggested that living fence rows should form part of any biodiversity strategy at a landscape level.”
- Scattered trees are keystone structures – Implications for conservation (2006, background): “Agroforestry has significant potential to achieve conservation goals in agricultural landscapes (Harvey et al., 2004; Salt et al., 2004) and lies at the intersection between agriculture and forestry.”
- The Brazilian Atlantic Forest: A Shrinking Biodiversity Hotspot (2011, background): “Isolated trees considerably increase the connectivity between fragments (Harvey et al. 2004), and thus their loss should be properly compensated by additional connectivity features such as corridors, which can compensate the homogenization caused by sugarcane plantations, especially in the state of ”