A review and evaluation of thermal insulation materials and methods for thermal energy storage systems
By Willy Villasmil, Ludger J Fischer, Jörg Worlitschek. Renewable & Sustainable Energy Reviews, 2019
293 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Abstract As thermal energy storage (TES) technologies gain more significance in the global energy market, there is an increasing demand to improve their energy efficiency and, more importantly, reduce their costs. In this article, two different methods for insulating TES systems that are either incorporated inside residential buildings or buried underground in direct vicinity of the building are reviewed and discussed. Boundary conditions are storage volumes in the range 10 – 1000 m3 and storage temperatures up to 90 °C. The first method involves the application of thermal insulation materials on the outside of the storage. Thermophysical properties and costs of conventional materials (such as mineral wools and organic foams) are compared against those of state-of-the-art products such as vacuum insulation panels and aerogels. A parametric comparative analysis is conducted to evaluate the combined costs of thermal insulation and living space occupied by the thermal insulation for TES systems integrated inside buildings. It is shown, for example, that the use of vacuum insulation panels becomes advantageous when the economic value of saving living space outweighs the extra cost of the insulation itself. The second method discussed is the so-called evacuated powders, in which the insulation is realized by creating an evacuated double-wall powder-containing envelope around the storage. The theoretical foundations of this method are discussed and the properties of commonly used powders – such as expanded perlite and fumed silica – are provided. Reference costs of double-wall vacuum-insulated TES tanks are provided and the use of evacuated powders is compared against the application of conventional insulation materials.
Subfields: Mechanical Engineering, Spectroscopy
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/43e33120e93f17b62d6bd071be62253e14d02528
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Spectroscopy
Citations in the corpus
- Traditional, state-of-the-art and renewable thermal building insulation materials: An overview (2019, background): “In addition to its high cost (compared to EPS or UPR, VIP costs between four and eight times more [56]), one of the major drawbacks of VIPs is the irreversible increase of thermal conductivity due to diffusion of water vapor and air through the envelope into the VIP core.”