The Research Audit Trial - Enhancing Trustworthiness in Qualitative Inquiry
By Marian Carcary. 2009
455 citations recorded by the source corpus.
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/43d95239aca1f8e187e7bff40cdeb2bd80e8b3ad
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
Citations in the corpus
- Validity, reliability, and generalizability in qualitative research (2015, background): “Hence, the essence of reliability for qualitative research lies with consistency.[24,28] A margin of variability for results is tolerated in qualitative research provided the methodology and epistemological logistics consistently yield data that are ontologically similar but may differ in richness a”
- The Research Audit Trail: Methodological Guidance for Application in Practice (2020, methodology): “CAQDAS also enables the researcher to concentrate his or her energy on the conceptual work of analysis, and on reflection and interpretation of the evidence base (Carcary, 2009).”