Flow Prediction in Ungauged Catchments Using Probabilistic Random Forests Regionalization and New Statistical Adequacy Tests
By C. Prieto, Nataliya Le Vine, Dmitri Kavetski, E. Garcia, Raúl Medina. Water Resources Research, 2019
85 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Flow prediction in ungauged catchments is a major unresolved challenge in scientific and engineering hydrology. This study attacks the prediction in ungauged catchment problem by exploiting advances in flow index selection and regionalization in Bayesian inference and by developing new statistical tests of model performance in ungauged catchments. First, an extensive set of available flow indices is reduced using principal component (PC) analysis to a compact orthogonal set of “flow index PCs.” These flow index PCs are regionalized under minimal assumptions using random forests regression augmented with a residual error model and used to condition hydrological model parameters using a Bayesian scheme. Second, “adequacy” tests are proposed to evaluate a priori the hydrological and regionalization model performance in the space of flow index PCs. The proposed regionalization approach is applied to 92 northern Spain catchments, with 16 catchments treated as ungauged. It is shown that (1) a small number of PCs capture approximately 87% of variability in the flow indices and (2) adequacy tests with respect to regionalized information are indicative of (but do not guarantee) the ability of a hydrological model to predict flow time series and are hence proposed as a prerequisite for flow prediction in ungauged catchments. The adequacy tests identify the regionalization of flow index PCs as adequate in 12 of 16 catchments but the hydrological model as adequate in only 1 of 16 catchments. Hence, a focus on improving hydrological model structure and input data (the effects of which are not disaggregated in this work) is recommended.
Subfields: Ecology, Environmental Engineering, Water Science and Technology
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/43ce562f8bbc0503625480a626312bb678807f13
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Ecology
In Environmental Engineering
In Water Science and Technology
- Alden Keefe Sampson
- Günter Klambauer
- Sepp Hochreiter
- Daniel Klotz
- Frederik Kratzert
- Guy Shalev
- Grey Nearing
Citations in the corpus
- Towards learning universal, regional, and local hydrological behaviors via machine learning applied to large-sample datasets (2019, methodology): “…the ten most similar catchments from the library in terms of climatic and physiographic characteristics to parameterize a simulation ensemble Prieto et al. (2019) first regionalized hydrologic signatures (Gupta et al., 2008) using a regression model (random forests), and then calibrated a…”
- Toward Improved Predictions in Ungauged Basins: Exploiting the Power of Machine Learning (2019, background): “One of the historical reasons why this has been a hard problem is because the usual strategy is to use observable catchment attributes or characteristics to identify or “regionalize” parameters of conceptual or process-based simulation models (e.g., Prieto et al., 2019; Razavi & Coulibaly, 2012).”