Measuring Gender (In)Equality: The OECD Gender, Institutions and Development Data Base

By J. Jütting, C. Morrisson, J. Dayton-Johnson, Denis Drechsler. 2008

115 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Gender Studies, Safety Research, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/43cd4878a237ae1780f6cb0977f3535071632a1a

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Gender Studies

1. M. Mills
2. Dong-Ju Lee
3. M. Brinton
4. Ronald R. Rindfuss
5. E. T. te Velde
6. P. McDonald
7. Bruno Arpino
8. G. Esping-Andersen

In Sociology and Political Science

1. M. Mills
2. P. McDonald
3. Ronald R. Rindfuss
4. Dong-Ju Lee
5. M. Brinton
6. E. T. te Velde
7. Tomas Kögel

Citations in the corpus

• Why do people postpone parenthood? Reasons and social policy incentives. (2011, background): “However, since it is highly disputed whether the GDI is actually a measure of gender equality or simply economic security or national prosperity (Jütting et al., 2008), it difficult to draw firm conclusions.”
• Gender‐Role Ideology, Labor Market Institutions, and Post‐industrial Fertility (2016, background): “As Mills (2010) and others (Jütting et al. 2008) have pointed out, the HDI is best considered as a summary measure of national economic prosperity and human development, which are related to gender equality but are not perfectly correlated with it.”