Deciphering the products of evolution at the species level: the need for an integrative taxonomy

156 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

A response to recent proposals for integrative taxonomy (2010, methodology): “© 2010 The Linnean Society of London, Biological Journal of the Linnean Society, 2010, 101, 747–756 747 distinct species, and, ultimately, when names should be given (Dayrat, 2005; Meiri & Mace, 2007; Alström et al., 2008; Valdecasas et al., 2008; Cardoso et al., 2009; Padial et al., 2009).”
The use of bioacoustics in anuran taxonomy: theory, terminology, methods and recommendations for best practice. (2017, background): “Taxonomy, the inventory and classification of organisms, is increasingly becoming an integrative discipline (Dayrat 2005; Padial et al. 2009).”
A new genus and species of rodent from the Brazilian Atlantic Forest (Rodentia: Cricetidae: Sigmodontinae: Oryzomyini), with comments on oryzomyine biogeography (2011, background): “…with continuous inventory programmes to uncover the total small mammal diversity of South America (Voss & Emmons, 1996), coupled with museum-based modern and integrative taxonomic approaches (Wheeler, 2004; Padial et al., 2009) and the establishment of phylogenetic hypotheses (Patton et al., 1997).”