A quantitative summary of attitudes toward wolves and their reintroduction (1972-2000)
By C. Williams, G. Ericsson, T. Heberlein. 2002
354 citations recorded by the source corpus.
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/43b1dbd508beb35e266276f5d3ac3c596f6f9c29
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
Citations in the corpus
- More than fear: role of emotions in acceptability of lethal control of wolves (2014, background): “While the majority of the general public in some western nations tends to accept the return of the wolf (Nilsen et al. 2007; Williams et al. 2002), those with direct experience are more inclined to oppose (Enck and Brown 2002; Ericsson and Heberlein 2003; Karlsson and Sjöström 2007).”
- Key factors driving attitudes towards large mammals in conflict with humans (2014, background): “Publications detailing attitudes of individuals not having direct experience with HWC were excluded, as the general public can have more positive attitudes towards wildlife when not directly affected (Kaltenborn et al., 2006; Martín-López et al., 2008; Williams et al., 2002).”
- Large carnivores, moose, and humans: a changing paradigm of predator management in the 21st century. (2003, background): “However, there appears to be a gradual shift toward carnivore conservation, especially among the more highly educated, urban, youth (Williams et al. 2002).”
- Animal Translocations: What are they and why do we do them? (2012, unknown): “…the provision of funding (and conversely through economic benefits that accrue to local communities (Kleiman, 1989) and labour, support for approvals, advocacy and lobbying for political and legislative change, and wider attitudinal changes through education and interaction (Williams et al., 2002).”