TNT version 1.5, including a full implementation of phylogenetic morphometrics
By Pablo A. Goloboff, S. Catalano. Cladistics, 2016
2,032 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Genetics, Paleontology
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/4393677240bb8c97e57767e2b238e817eb2b1bff
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics
- T. Carr
- O. Mateus
- Martín E. Morales
- J. Choiniere
- R. Araújo
- Christophe Hendrickx
- Pablo A. Goloboff
- S. Catalano
In Genetics
In Paleontology
Citations in the corpus
- Higher‐level phylogeny and evolutionary history of Pentatomomorpha (Hemiptera: Heteroptera) inferred from mitochondrial genome sequences (2019, methodology): “…(PCGRNA and PCG12RNA) were retrieved under Bayesian inference (BI) using phylobayes mpi v.1.5a (Lartillot et al., 2013), with a maximum parsimony (MP) method using tnt v.1.5 (Goloboff & Catalano, 2016), and under maximum likelihood (ML) optimization using iq-tree 1.6.5 (Trifinopoulos et al., 2016).”
- The distribution of dental features in non-avian theropod dinosaurs: Taxonomic potential, degree of homoplasy, and major evolutionary trends (2019, methodology): “Character distributions for dental features were visualized on each tree using TNT 1.5 (Goloboff and Catalano, 2016) and WinClada 1.00.08 (Nixon, 2002) based on the Nexus file created with Mesquite 3.2.”
- TNT version 1.6, with a graphical interface for MacOS and Linux, including new routines in parallel (2023, methodology): “…of landmark data-sets, TNT first uses a rough approximation to discard many trees as not possibly matching the best score found so far (see Goloboff and Catalano, 2016), and only for the rearrangements passing that initial test is a full optimization done (if the tree effectively matches…”
- A high-resolution growth series of Tyrannosaurus rex obtained from multiple lines of evidence (2020, methodology): “The character matrix (S3) was analyzed in TnT v. 1.5 (Goloboff, Farris & Nixon, 2003; Goloboff & Catalano, 2016) under a driven New Technology search using the default parameters for ratchet, tree drift, tree fusion, and sectorial search, and 10 replicates were run to find a minimum length ontogram.”