Treatment of calcific aortic stenosis with the percutaneous heart valve: mid-term follow-up from the initial feasibility studies: the French experience.

By A. Cribier, H. Eltchaninoff, C. Tron, F. Bauer, C. Agatiello, D. Nercolini, S. Tapiero, P. Litzler, J. Bessou, V. Babaliaros. Journal of the American College of Cardiology, 2006

797 citations recorded by the source corpus.

OBJECTIVES The aim of this work was to study the feasibility, safety, efficacy, and durability of percutaneous heart valve (PHV) implantation in the aortic position. BACKGROUND We developed a PHV (equine pericardium valve in a balloon-expandable, stainless-steel stent) to treat patients with inoperable aortic stenosis (AS). METHODS Thirty-six patients (aortic valve area < or =0.7 cm2, New York Heart Association [NYHA] functional class IV, and severe comorbidities), formally declined for surgery, were recruited on a compassionate basis. The PHV was implanted by retrograde or antegrade trans-septal approach. Clinical and echocardiographic outcomes were assessed serially. RESULTS Twenty-seven patients were implanted successfully (23 antegrade, 4 retrograde) in the subcoronary position with improvement in valve area (0.60 +/- 0.11 cm2 to 1.70 +/- 0.10 cm2, p < 0.0001) and transvalvular gradient (37 +/- 13 mm Hg to 9 +/- 2 mm Hg, p < 0.0001). Paravalvular aortic regurgitation was grade 0 to 1 (n = 10), grade 2 (n = 12), and grade 3 (n = 5). One week post-procedure, improvement in left ventricular function (45 +/- 18% to 53 +/- 14%, p = 0.02) was most pronounced in patients with ejection fraction <50% (35 +/- 10% to 50 +/- 16%, p < 0.0001). Thirty-day major adverse events after successful implantation were 26% (pericardial tamponade, stroke, arrhythmia, urosepsis, and one death unexplained at autopsy). Eleven patients are currently alive with follow-up of 9 months (n = 2), 10 months (n = 3), 11 months (n = 1), 12 months (n = 2), 23 months (n = 1), and 26 months (n = 2). All patients experienced amelioration of symptoms (>90% NYHA functional class I to II). Percutaneous heart valve function remained unchanged during follow-up, and no deaths were device-related. CONCLUSIONS Percutaneous heart valve implantation is feasible in inoperable patients with end-stage AS leading to hemodynamic and clinical improvement. Continued advances and improved patient selection should decrease adverse events in the near future.

Subfields: Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, Epidemiology, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/438928e035ee538855967332240636a8ed049eda

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

D. Hildick-Smith
R. Levy
U. Trivedi
S. Davies
Robert H. Anderson
J. Kovac
A. Becker
T. Daniel

Citations in the corpus

Anatomy of the Aortic Valvar Complex and Its Implications for Transcatheter Implantation of the Aortic Valve (2008, methodology): “The following dimensions should be measured before implantation: (1) diameter of ascending aorta; (2) diameter of sinutubular junction; (3) height and width of sinus of Valsalva; (4) height of takeoff of coronary artery ostia in relation to the point of basal attachment of the aortic valvar leaflets”
Long-term outcomes after transcatheter aortic valve implantation in high-risk patients with severe aortic stenosis: the U.K. TAVI (United Kingdom Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation) Registry. (2011, background): “A number of observational clinical studies demonstrated the feasibility (6,7) of TAVI leading its use as an alternative treatment in these patients (8–10).”