Significance of butterfly eyespots as an anti-predator device in ground-based and aerial attacks
By A. Lyytinen, P. Brakefield, J. Mappes. 2003
97 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Genetics, Nature and Landscape Conservation
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/438658c80f101e5103a6b16b0b5d86608e31040c
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics
In Genetics
In Nature and Landscape Conservation
Citations in the corpus
- Conspicuousness, not eye mimicry, makes "eyespots" effective antipredator signals (2008, background): “Although there is little experimental evidence that eyespots have a deflective role (e.g., see Lyytinen et al. 2003, 2004 ), evidence that some lepidopteran wing spots possess an intimidating function has been convincingly demonstrated in both peacock butterflies (Inachis io) and eyed hawk moths (S”
- Butterfly habitats, broad‐scale biotope affiliations, and structural exploitation of vegetation at finer scales: the matrix revisited (2004, background): “Butterflies with large/prominent marginal wing spotting (ocellation) are expected to occur in more structurally complex vegetation (Dennis et al., 1986), warmer areas and where adults can be more active (Brakefield, 1984; Dennis et al., 1986; Lyytinen et al., 2003).”
- Predators as drivers of insect defenses (2020, background): “1f ), which hunts diurnal insects, is commonly used as a model predator to investigate antipredator defenses in insects (Brower & Brower 1965; Krall et al. 1999; Lyytinen et al. 2003; Whitman & Vincent 2008; Byers 2015).”