Challenging images: tackling stigma through estate regeneration
By A. Hastings, J. Dean. 2003
118 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Finance, Urban Studies
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/4372385f9ad48557b14bfe63b940b7d98e773d88
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Finance
In Urban Studies
Citations in the corpus
- Should Policy Makers Strive for Neighborhood Social Mix? An Analysis of the Western European Evidence Base (2007, unknown): “The work of several authors is noteworthy (Dean & Hastings, 2000; Hastings, 2004; Hastings & Dean, 2003; Power, 1997; Taylor, 1998; Wacquant, 1993).”
- Residential Satisfaction in Housing Estates in European Cities: A Multi-level Research Approach (2011, background): “First, there is a strong focus on the negative appearance of the buildings; perceived negative housing characteristics at the level of the dwelling and estate (such as monotonous buildings) receive much attention (see Hastings & Dean, 2003; Rowlands et al., 2009).”
- Who Is Affected by Neighbourhood Income Mix? Gender, Age, Family, Employment and Income Differences (2010, background): “Case study evidence suggests that place-based stigmatisation is an oftoccurring process in western Europe (see especially Wacquant, 1993; Power, 1997; Taylor, 1998; Atkinson and Kintrea, 1998; Dean and Hastings, 2000; Hastings and Dean, 2003; Martin and Watkinson, 2003; and Hastings, 2004).”
- Determinants of Neighbourhood Satisfaction and Perception of Neighbourhood Reputation (2011, background): “Hastings & Dean (2003) argue that neighbourhoods located at the fringe of the city are less well-known by nonresidents than neighbourhoods closer to the city centre, which has a negative impact on the reputation of neighbourhoods.”
- The Mechanism(s) of Neighbourhood Effects: Theory, Evidence, and Policy Implications (2012, background): “S statistical evidence (already cited) overwhelmingly suggests that affluent residents convey positive externalities to their less-well of neighbors, there is at least one dissenting study: Ginther, Haveman and Wolfe’s (2000) analysis of U.”