Equilibria with Local Governments and Commuting: Income Sorting vs. Income Mixing

By C. D. Bartolome, Stephen L. Ross. 2003

110 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Economics and Econometrics, Political Science and International Relations

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/4361f842ae4b1b7a6ff3acfdd1897bd2be06a911

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Economics and Econometrics

1. Edward L. Glaeser
2. Matthew E. Kahn
3. J. Rappaport
4. Junjie Wu
5. Gilles Duranton
6. Mark D. Partridge
7. Siqi Zheng
8. Albert Saiz

In Political Science and International Relations

1. Matthew E. Kahn
2. Edward L. Glaeser
3. J. Rappaport
4. Junjie Wu
5. William L. C. Wheaton
6. A. Alesina
7. Elvire Guillaud
8. Gilles Duranton

Citations in the corpus

• Environmental amenities, urban sprawl, and community characteristics (2006, background): “Two noticeable exceptions are de Bartolome and Ross [ 8 ,9], who show that there are equilibria with income mixing when commuting costs are considered in a model of local jurisdictions, and that communities face a trade-off between efficiency and equity as to which equilibrium is preferred.”
• Why do the poor live in cities? The role of public transportation ✩ (2008, background): “…levels affects income sorting within a metropolitan area, see de Bartolome and Ross [3]. since if two groups neighbor each other they will pay the same at the point of contact, but the group with the steeper bid-rent gradient will be willing to pay more for land at distances closer to the city…”