Path Planning for Automation of Surgery Robot based on Probabilistic Roadmap and Reinforcement Learning

By D. Baek, Minho Hwang, Hansoul Kim, D. Kwon. 2018

36 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Laparoscopic robotic surgery is a new surgical method performed by inserting several surgical tools and a laparoscope through an umbilical incision [12]. Compared with conventional laparoscopic surgery minimizes patient pain with minimally invasive surgery and has many advantages in terms of beauty. However, medical doctor's fatigue due to repetitive operations such as tissue resection and suturing still remains a problem to be improved. To solve this problem, there are a lot of automation researches on surgical robots [1], [7]–[10]. Especially in cutting automaton, for high accuracy, optimal path planning is essential factor. Probabilistic Roadmap (PRM) is a popular method for path planning. It creates path from static environment to desired point without collision. However, this does not show great performance in a dynamic environment. Reinforcement Learning (RL) shows strong performance in an unspecified probabilistic environment and it is widely applied to robot motion learning because learning data is not needed before [4]. In this paper, we suggest a collision avoidance path planning for automation of surgery robot by using PRM and RL in dynamic situation. We found the collision avoidance path through PRM and RL, and used mapping algorithm of coordination system from pixel to world coordination and transformed the coordination system from cartesian space to joint space using inverse kinematics. Finally, we apply it to the APOLLON laparoscopic surgery robotic system developed by KAIST in V-rep simulator. As a result, we confirmed a possible of collision avoidance path planning for automation of resection task for surgery robot.

Subfields: Aerospace Engineering, Artificial Intelligence, Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Artificial Intelligence

  1. Chao Yu
  2. Jiming Liu
  3. Shamim Nemati
  4. Thanh Thi Nguyen
  5. Fernando Bello
  6. Saeid Nahavandi
  7. Ngoc Duy Nguyen
  8. Jieyi Long

In Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition

  1. Shamim Nemati
  2. Saeid Nahavandi
  3. Chao Yu
  4. Thanh Thi Nguyen
  5. Jiming Liu
  6. Ngoc Duy Nguyen

Citations in the corpus