Insecurity and Welfare Regimes in Asia, Africa and Latin America: Latin America : towards a liberal-informal welfare regime

By I. Gough, G. Wood, A. Barrientos, P. Bevan, P. Davis, Graham Room. 2004

236 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Finance, General Health Professions, Political Science and International Relations

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/432b8d560d677b37709c6d2d24da58de546a8599

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Finance

1. I. Gough
2. G. Atkinson
3. S. Mourato

In General Health Professions

1. G. Wood
2. I. Gough
3. S. Mourato
4. C. Bambra
5. C. Jensen
6. A. Barrientos
7. M. Powell

In Political Science and International Relations

1. G. Wood
2. E. Milner‐Gulland
3. I. Gough
4. C. Bambra
5. C. Jensen
6. A. Barrientos
7. M. Powell

Citations in the corpus

• Assessing the Relationship Between Human Well-being and Ecosystem Services: A Review of Frameworks (2014, background): “Gough et al. (2004) identify three types of security regimes: insecurity regimes, dependent security regimes, and welfare state regimes, which are relevant for the developing world.”
• A comparative welfare regime approach to global social policy (2006, background): “As a result, according to Barrientos (2004), by the 1990s the welfare regime began to shift to a liberalinformal one.”