TCP Veno: TCP enhancement for transmission over wireless access networks

By C. Fu, Soung Chang Liew. IEEE J. Sel. Areas Commun., 2003

597 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Understanding Operational 5G: A First Measurement Study on Its Coverage, Performance and Energy Consumption (2020, methodology): “However, the traditional loss/delay based TCP algorithms suffer from extremely low bandwidth utilization— only 21.1%, 31.9%, 12.1%, 14.3%, for Reno, Cubic, Vegas, and Veno, respectively!”
CUBIC: a new TCP-friendly high-speed TCP variant (2008, methodology): “TCP-Veno [17] determines the congestion window size very similar to TCP-NewReno, but it uses the delay information of TCP-Vegas to diﬀerentiate non-congestion losses.”
Host-to-Host Congestion Control for TCP (2010, background): “Mac TCP Tahoe [14] II-B 1992 Tahoe Queuing delay as a supplemental congestion prediction parameter for Congestion Avoidance S Experimental TCP Reno [16], [17] , [19] II-E 1996 RFC793 Extended information in feedback messages P+S+R II-G 1995 Reno Bottleneck buffer utilization as a primary feedback fo”
A comprehensive survey on machine learning for networking: evolution, applications and research opportunities (2018, methodology): “In the latter approach, end-systems are complemented with solutions, such as TCP-Veno [156] and TCPWestwood [463].”