Adult romantic attachment: Developments in the study of couple relationships.
By Judith A. Feeney. 2008
340 citations recorded by the source corpus.
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/430eb6ddf8d8736a42256f601267d19922fa81df
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
- A. Moors
- Jes L. Matsick
- Terri D. Conley
- W. Rholes
- H. Schechinger
- Jeffry A. Simpson
- Robin S. Edelstein
- Stephen L. Wright
Citations in the corpus
- Attached to monogamy? Avoidance predicts willingness to engage (but not actual engagement) in consensual non-monogamy (2015, background): “Attachment security is linked with stable relationships characterized by high trust, commitment, satisfaction, and intimacy as well as low jealousy (Feeney, 2008).”
- Mentalizing in the Development and Treatment of Attachment Trauma (2013, background): “I am hitting the highlights by providing prototypical character sketches, and readers are referred to more extensive reviews for the details (Feeney, 2008; Hazan & Shaver, 1994; Mikulincer & Shaver, 2007a, 2008).”
- Adult Attachment Orientations, Stress, and Romantic Relationships (2012, background): “All of these characteristics explain why avoidant people tend to have less close and less satisfying relationships that often end prematurely (Feeney, 2008).”
- An Examination of the Role of Attachment and Efficacy in Life Satisfaction (2010, background): “According to attachment theory, people’s attachment levels are difficult to change (Feeney, 2008), but if one considers the social cognitive factor of self-efficacy, optimism remains for those whose attachment histories were less than positive.”
- Unique and shared relationship benefits of consensually non-monogamous and monogamous relationships: A review and insights for moving forward. (2017, background): “as it reflects comfort with intimacy and is linked with a host of positive outcomes (Feeney, 2008).”