A framework for analyzing climate change adaptations as actions
By K. Eisenack, R. Stecker. Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, 2012
192 citations recorded by the source corpus.
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/42f05fcac753755d9e2a75dd8d1bc6f6962366fa
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
- D. Huitema
- E. Massey
- R. Biesbroek
- L. Berrang‐Ford
- A. Jordan
- J. Ford
- A. Lesnikowski
- Carolyn Poutiainen
Citations in the corpus
- What drives national adaptation? A global assessment (2014, background): “Adaptive capacity reflects the potential for adaptation; however, adaptation is neither inevitable nor automatic even where adaptive capacity is high (Eisenack and Stecker 2012; Ford and King 2013).”
- Climate policy innovation:The adoption and diffusion of adaptation policies across Europe (2014, background): “An important barrier is the lack of political awareness and sense of urgency, resulting in limited political motivation to act (Dupuis and Knoepfel, 2011; Biesbroek et al., 2013; Eriksen and Lind, 2009; Eisenack and Stecker, 2012).”
- A typology of adaptation actions: A global look at climate adaptation actions financed through the Global Environment Facility (2014, background): “While existing categorizations of adaptation actions have helped to understand the form of adaptation, more information is needed to ground-truth these theoretical classifications with onthe-ground adaptation activities (Eisenack and Stecker, 2012; Tompkins et al., 2010).”