Linearization of Chains and Sideward Movement

By Jairo Nunes. 2004

652 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Artificial Intelligence, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Language and Linguistics

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/42dcc910fe1dc6266f9fecdbd4a50adbd3c63d0f

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Artificial Intelligence

In Experimental and Cognitive Psychology

In Language and Linguistics

Citations in the corpus

On Multidominance and Linearization (2009, background): “…in terms of multidominance: (28) a. b. 10 I am aware of proposals involving spelled-out copies or traces for particular phenomena such as resumptive pronouns and wh-copying; for discussion, see Aoun & Li 2003, Grohmann 2003, Nunes 2004, Barbiers et al. 2008, and Schippers 2008, among others.”
Rescue by PF Deletion, Traces as (Non)interveners, and the That-Trace Effect (2011, background): “Nunes (2004) expands on this analysis, providing rich empirical evidence in its favor, and implements Chomsky’s morphological reanalysis in terms of morphological fusion, which fuses parts of complex heads into a single morphological element.”
Number Long Distance Agreement in (Substandard) Basque (2006, neutral): “It introduces a variety of complications in the computational system, ranging from the linearization of copies (see e.g. Kayne 1994; Nunes, 2004; Uriagereka 1999a) to the interpretation of displaced elements in scope and binding relations (Hornstein 1995, among many others).”
What the PCC tells us about “abstract” agreement, head movement, and locality (2019, methodology): “The analysis is in some sense inspired by the work of Nunes (2004); Bošković & Nunes (2007), and, in particular, by their focus on the mechanics of phonological chain reduction (i.e., the suppression of pronunciation of some copies in a movement chain) as the key to understanding doubling phenomena.”
Clitic doubling or object agreement: the view from Amharic (2014, background): “This is expected since, at PF, the two copies will be distinct, as defined in Kandybowicz (2007) and earlier work on the copy theory of movement (cf. Nunes 2004; Landau 2006; Bošković and Nunes 2007).38 Under the copy analysis, all the problems detailed above are avoided.”