SURVEYING THE BRIGHT STARS BY OPTICAL INTERFEROMETRY. I. A SEARCH FOR MULTIPLICITY AMONG STARS OF SPECTRAL TYPES F-K

By Donald Hutter, R. Zavala, C. Tycner, J. Benson, C. Hummel, J. Sanborn, O. Franz, K. Johnston. 2016

204 citations recorded by the source corpus.

We present the first results from an ongoing survey for multiplicity among the bright stars using the Navy Precision Optical Interferometer (NPOI). We first present a summary of NPOI observations of known multiple systems, including the first detection of the companion of β Scuti with precise relative astrometry, to illustrate the instrument’s detection sensitivity for binaries at magnitude differences Δm ⪅ 3 over the range of angular separation 3–860 milliarcseconds (mas). A limiting Δm700 ∼ 3.5 is likely for binaries where the component spectral types differ by less than two. Model fits to these data show good agreement with published orbits, and we additionally present a new orbit solution for one of these stars, σ Her. We then discuss early results of the survey of bright stars at δ −20°. This survey, which complements previous surveys of the bright stars using speckle interferometry, initially emphasizes bright stars of spectral types F0 through K2. We report observations of 41 stars of apparent visual magnitude mV , all having been observed on multiple nights. Analysis of these data produces fitted angular separations, position angles, and component magnitude differences for six previously known visual binaries. Three additional systems were examined as possible binaries, but no conclusive detection could be made. No evidence of close stellar companions within our detection limit of Δm ≈3 was found for the remaining 32 stars observed; however, uniform-disk angular diameters are reported for 11 of the resolved stars in this last group.

Subfields: Astronomy and Astrophysics, Computational Mechanics, Instrumentation

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/42c2816e3720a267341fbb899f204551c7f69d54

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Astronomy and Astrophysics

1. R. Zavala
2. J. T. Armstrong
3. G. Belle
4. H. Schmitt
5. E. Baines
6. J. Benson
7. Donald Hutter
8. C. Tycner

In Computational Mechanics

1. R. Zavala
2. J. T. Armstrong
3. G. Belle
4. H. Schmitt
5. E. Baines
6. J. Benson
7. Donald Hutter
8. C. Tycner

In Instrumentation

1. R. Zavala
2. J. T. Armstrong
3. G. Belle
4. H. Schmitt
5. E. Baines
6. J. Benson
7. Donald Hutter
8. C. Tycner

Citations in the corpus

• Fundamental Parameters of 87 Stars from the Navy Precision Optical Interferometer (2017, methodology): “…133124 3.055±0.077 N/A N/A 133208 2.484±0.008 2.477±0.065 Mozurkewich et al. (2003) 2.48±0.08 Nordgren et al. (2001) 2.47±0.04 Nordgren et al. (2001) 136726 2.149±0.023 2.366±0.020 Baines et al. (2010) 137759 3.559±0.011 3.596±0.015 Baines et al. (2011) 140573 4.770±0.013 4.807±0.035 Hutter et al.…”