Peasant-driven agricultural growth and food sovereignty
By Jan Douwe van der Ploeg. 2014
187 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: General Agricultural and Biological Sciences, Plant Science, Sociology and Political Science
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/42b24baf7fd57c4fe8dba21cb522a7452291186b
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In General Agricultural and Biological Sciences
In Plant Science
In Sociology and Political Science
Citations in the corpus
- African farmer-led irrigation development: re-framing agricultural policy and investment? (2017, background): “These investments involve actively engaging with (irrigation) technologies and external (support) networks as well as integrating into local and international markets, as argued by Edelman (2014) and Van der Ploeg (2014).”
- Climate-smart agriculture: what is it good for? (2018, background): “In this respect, the call to increase productivity can, depending on the specific measure of productivity intended, embed distinct assumptions about the social character of agriculture within policy discourses and validate specific trajectories of agrarian change (see van der Ploeg 2014).”
- Agrarian political economy and modern world capitalism: the contributions of food regime analysis (2016, background): “It contains some more and less critical articles by Agarwal (2014), Bernstein (2014) and Edelman (2014), albeit outnumbered by (re-)statements by food sovereignty advocates, including van der Ploeg (2014) and McMichael (2014).”
- Food Sovereignty and Fome Zero: Connecting Public Food Procurement Programmes to Sustainable Rural Development in Brazil (2017, unknown): “The PAA, in particular, supports food sovereignty’s ‘peasant principle’, which focuses on selling surplus from subsistence activities rather than a sole focus on scaling up production specifically to capture market share (van der Ploeg 2014).”
- Safeguarding pollinators and their values to human well-being (2016, unknown): “These benefits can be fostered through holistic responses including food sovereignty 62 , and biocultural conservation approaches 63 that recognize rights, support economies and address negative multipliers of land-use change effects such as loss of access to traditional territories and loss of…”