Commentary: A Dissenting View on So-Called Paradoxes of Reliability Coefficients

95 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Three Decades of Reliability in Communication Content Analyses (2016, methodology): “Krippendorff (2013) argues that tests of association, such as Pearson’s r, are not equivalent to tests of agreement.”
Measuring inter-rater reliability for nominal data – which coefficients and confidence intervals are appropriate? (2016, background): “the understanding of observed and expected agreement [36].”
Intellectual capital and SMEs’ performance: A structured literature review (2019, result): “Quantifying reliability in this way resulted in a Krippendorff ’ s alpha score above 0.8, thus reliability of the results was confirmed (Krippendorff, 2013).”