On the equivalence between the thermodynamic and dynamic measurements of the glass transition in confined polymers

By Rodney D. Priestley, D. Cangialosi, S. Napolitano. 2015

134 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Understanding why the glass transition temperature (Tg) of polymers deviates substantially from the bulk with nanoscale confinement has been a 20-year mystery. Ever since the observation in the mid-1990s that the Tg values of amorphous polymer thin films are different from their bulk values, efforts to understand this behavior have intensified, and the topic remains the subject of intense research and debate. This is due to the combined scientific and technological implications of size-dependent glassy properties. Here, we discuss an intriguing aspect of the glassy behavior of confined amorphous polymers. As experimentally assessed, the glass transition is a dynamic event mediated by segmental dynamics. Thus, it seems intuitive to expect that a change in Tg due to confinement necessitates a corresponding change in molecular dynamics, and that such change in dynamics may be predicted based on our understanding of the glass transition. The aim of this perspectives article is to examine whether or not segmental dynamics change in accordance with the value of Tg for confined polymers based on bulk rules. We highlight past and recent findings that have examined the relationship between Tg and segmental dynamics of confined polymers. Within this context, the decoupling between these two aspects of the glass transition in confinement is emphasized. We discuss these results within the framework of our current understanding of the glass transition as well as efforts to resolve this decoupling. Finally, the anomalous decoupling between translational (diffusion) and rotational (segmental) motion taking place in the proximity of attractive interfaces in polymer thin films is discussed.

Subfields: Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials, Materials Chemistry

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/42934f873931a032a952020d52c2b3c9935eb7fb

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials

  1. K. Winey
  2. E. Bailey

In Materials Chemistry

  1. K. Winey
  2. E. Bailey

Citations in the corpus