The name Fusarium moniliforme should no longer be used

By K. Seifert, Takayuki Aoki, R. P. Baayen, D. Brayford, L. Burgess, S. Chulze, W. Gams, David M. Geiser, J. Gruyter, J. Leslie and 9 more. 2003

112 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Cell Biology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/42927ccfe50b64336640ed2c7c5d7baff9e7d5b4

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Cell Biology

1. E. Liew
2. B. Summerell
3. J. Leslie
4. Matthew Laurence

Citations in the corpus

• Fusarium species associated with plants in Australia (2010, background): “These latter associations are less certain due to the confusion associated with the name “Fusarium moniliforme”, which was used for this fungus throughout most of the twentieth century (Seifert et al. 2003).”
• Fifty years of Fusarium: how could nine species have ever been enough? (2011, background): “…species concepts have helped resolve old problems in the genus, such as. the need to redefine the entities found within Fusarium moniliforme (Seifert et al. 2003), and conversely used to recombine cerrtain new species, among them F. pseudoanthophilum and F. brevicatenulatum (Amata et al.…”