EVOLUTION OF MACROCYSTIS SPP. (PHAEOPHYCEAE) AS DETERMINED BY ITS1 AND ITS2 SEQUENCES1,

By J. Coyer, G. Smith, R. Andersen. 2001

134 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Oceanography, Plant Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/4291cce4e2e591c1c7e1c9b7bc1947e5fe3eec51

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics

1. J. Vásquez
2. J. Waters
3. M. Thiel
4. L. Gutow
5. M. Graham
6. J. Bolton
7. G. Zuccarello
8. A. Buschmann

In Oceanography

1. J. Vásquez
2. Erasmo C. Macaya
3. J. Waters
4. A. Buschmann
5. M. Thiel
6. J. Bolton
7. P. Haye
8. G. Zuccarello

In Plant Science

1. J. Waters
2. G. Hernández-Carmona
3. M. Thiel
4. J. Bolton
5. G. Zuccarello
6. Erasmo C. Macaya

Citations in the corpus

• The Ecology of Rafting in the Marine Environment. II. The Rafting Organisms and Community (2005, background): “Spore-release has also been reported for detached macroalgae Macrocystis pyrifera floating at the sea surface (citations in Coyer et al. 2001) and Miller et al. (2000) discussed that sorus-bearing sporophytes of Pelagophycus porra may be important in dispersal of that species along the California…”
• The biogeography of kelps (Laminariales, Phaeophyceae): a global analysis with new insights from recent advances in molecular phylogenetics (2010, background): “Molecular data (ITS sequences) places all Southern Hemisphere isolates (formerly considered to represent three separate species) in the same clade, most closely related to specimens from the most southern sites in the Northeast PaciWc (Santa Catalina Island, California and Bahia Tortugas, Baja Calif”
• GLOBAL ECOLOGY OF THE GIANT KELP MACROCYSTIS : FROM ECOTYPES TO ECOSYSTEMS (2007, background): “Such a limitation is compounded by the great worldwide scientific and economic importance of this genus, the acclimatisation of Macrocystis to regional environments, and the recent finding that gene flow occurs among the most geographically distant regions over ecological timescales (Coyer et al. 20”
• Farming of the Giant Kelp Macrocystis Pyrifera in Southern Chile for Development of Novel Food Products (2006, background): “Recently, it has been demonstrated that Chilean stocks of M. pyrifera show small genetic differences from other Southern Hemisphere species, but stronger differences from Californian stocks (Coyer et al., 2001).”
• PRESENCE OF SPOROPHYLLS IN FLOATING KELP RAFTS OF MACROCYSTIS SPP. (PHAEOPHYCEAE) ALONG THE CHILEAN PACIFIC COAST 1 (2005, background): “In a molecular study, Coyer et al. (2001) suggested that Macrocystis is a monospecific genus, yet along the Chilean coast two species of Macrocystis are readily distinguished based on morphological characteristics, namely M. integrifolia Bory de Saint-Vincent, with a flat holdfasts and narrow…”
• The ecology of rafting in the marine environment. I: The floating substrata (2004, background): “, Smith & Simpson 1995, Cragg 2003). Seeds are high in lipid and protein content and they are often protected by lignified shells. Guppy (1906) provides an interesting account on the specific gravity of the seeds of some coastal trees (e.”
• Driven by the West Wind Drift? A synthesis of southern temperate marine biogeography, with new directions for dispersalism (2008, background): “…ITS2 sequences (fast-evolving nuclear loci) show little genetic differentiation across a wide southern geographic range spanning Chile, South Africa, Marion Island, Tasmania, mainland Australia, and New Zealand (Coyer et al., 2001); this finding can only be explained by much more recent dispersal.”
• REPRODUCTIVE LONGEVITY OF DRIFTING KELP MACROCYSTIS PYRIFERA (PHAEOPHYCEAE) IN MONTEREY BAY, USA 1 (2006, background): “Coyer et al. (2001) further suggested that gene flow between Northern and Southern Hemisphere Macrocystis populations may have occurred as recently as 10,000 years ago.”
• The ecology of rafting in the marine environment. III. Biogeographical and evolutionary consequences (2006, background): “Using rDNA, Coyer et al. (2001) examined the genetic relatedness among four putative species of Macrocystis (Figure 14), and their results led them to suggest that “Macrocystis may be a monospecific genus (M.”
• Evolutionary pathways among shallow and deep-sea echinoids of the genus Sterechinus in the Southern Ocean (2011, result): “…benthic organisms are in agreement with our results, showing recurrent and modern gene flow among Subantarctic regions in Ostrea chilensis (Ó Foighil et al., 1999), Macrocystis pyrifera (Coyer et al., 2001), Mytilus spp. (Gérard et al., 2008), and Durvillaea antarctica (Fraser et al., 2009).”
• Genetic structure of the giant kelp Macrocystis pyrifera along the southeastern Pacific (2010, methodology): “Mol Ecol 9: 1657–1659 Coyer JA, Smith GJ, Andersen RA (2001) Evolution of Macrocystis spp. (Phaeophyceae) as determined by ITS1 and ITS2 sequences.”