Structured professional judgment of violence risk in forensic clinical practice: a prospective study into the predictive validity of the Dutch HCR-20

By V. de Vogel, C. de Ruiter. 2006

100 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Clinical Psychology, Health, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/428ee99b4f2fbe7c5207358c5c1c10fd6fb70f47

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Clinical Psychology

1. V. de Vogel
2. C. de Ruiter
3. M. de Vries Robbé

In Health

1. M. de Vries Robbé
2. V. de Vogel

In Sociology and Political Science

1. V. de Vogel
2. C. de Ruiter
3. M. de Vries Robbé

Citations in the corpus

• Assessing Protective Factors in Forensic Psychiatric Practice: Introducing the SAPROF (2011, background): “Furthermore, discussion with colleagues to reach a final judgment of violence risk is encouraged (De Vogel & De Ruiter, 2006 ).”