Globalization and Its (Dis-)Content: Trade Shocks and Voting Behavior
By C. Dippel, Robert S. Gold, Stephan Heblich. 2015
145 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Economics and Econometrics, Political Science and International Relations
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/42884502debe4191d6ee169745e871f10611cebd
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Economics and Econometrics
- David H. Autor
- David Dorn
- Gordon H. Hanson
- Kaveh Majlesi
- Daron Acemoglu
- P. Restrepo
- A. Salomons
- Danny Yagan
In Political Science and International Relations
Citations in the corpus
- Did Austerity Cause Brexit? (2019, unknown): “2017; Dippel, Gold, and Heblich 2015).2 While labor market dynamics are important in contributing to the growing reliance on the welfare state, the results presented here are not confounded by labor market shocks; rather, they capture genuine effects due to changes in the United Kingdom’s welfare…”
- Importing Political Polarization? The Electoral Consequences of Rising Trade Exposure (2020, background): “…that have been more exposed to trade with low-wage countries have seen larger increases in vote shares for extreme-right parties (Malgouyres, 2014; Dippel, Gold, and Heblich, 2015) and localities in Britain that were more exposed to trade with China voted more strongly in favor of leaving the EU…”
- Global Competition and Brexit (2018, unknown): “…success of incumbents (Hellwig and Samuels 2007; Kayser and Peress 2012); others have started looking at how globalization affects party and candidate choice (Autor et al. 2016; Che et al. 2016; Dippel, Gold, and Heblich 2015; Jensen, Quinn, and Weymouth 2016;Mughan,Bean, andMcAllister 2003).”