Garbage and Recycling with Endogenous Local Policy

By Thomas C. Kinnaman, D. Fullerton. 2000

279 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering, Pollution, Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/426a6502351c3e896c3b4437bf30b633bc5b0d11

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering

In Pollution

In Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment

Citations in the corpus

Effects of Unit-Based Garbage Pricing: A Differences-in-Differences Approach (2010, unknown): “Following Kinnaman and Fullerton (2000), we assume that municipalities trade off bene-ﬁts and costs to determine the optimal price.”
Recycling and Waste Diversion Effectiveness: Evidence from Canada (2005, background): “These community level analyses include Wertz (1976), Saltzman et al. (1993), Callan and Thomas (1997), Podolsky and Spiegel (1998), and Kinnaman and Fullerton (2000) .”
Do Public Sector Reforms Get Rusty? Local Privatization in Spain (2006, methodology): “This variable has also been used in demand studies for this service (i.e. Kinnaman and Fullerton, 2000).”
Explaining the variation in household recycling rates across the UK (2011, methodology): “ 22 12 Kinnaman and Fullerton (2000) also control for the possible endogeneity of recycling policy, where the probability of a kerbside scheme existing depends upon the socio-economic characteristics of a community.”
The Determinants of Household Recycling: A Material Specific Analysis of Recycling Program Features and Unit Pricing (2003, background): “Our finding of no effect of disposal price on recycling efforts is consistent with the findings of earlier studies by Kinnaman and Fullerton (1998), Fullerton and Kinnaman (1996) and Reschovsky and Stone (1994) which find that unit pricing does not significantly affect the level of recycling or the…”
A Comparison of Household Recycling Behaviors in Norway and the United States (2007, background): “literature is mixed on this point, as there are several studies which find an effect of disposal fees on recycling effort (e.g., Hong et al. 1993; Callan and Thomas 1997; Hong 1999; Ferrara and Missios 2005), and several which do not (e.g., Reschovsky and Stone 1994; Fullerton and Kinnaman 1996; Ki”
Factors influencing the rate of recycling: An analysis of Minnesota counties (2010, methodology): “, 2001) and the studies that utilize macro-level data such as a community or county-level data (Podolsky and Spiegel, 1998; Kinnaman and Fullerton, 2000; Johnstone and Labonne, 2004; Callan and Thomas, 2006).”
The costs of municipal waste and recycling programs (2010, background): “Studies have also linked household participation rates to bag/tag unit pricing for waste disposal (Reschovsky and Stone, 1994; Hong et al., 1993; Miranda et al., 1994; Fullerton and Kinnaman, 1996; Podolsky and Spiegel, 1999; Kinnaman and Fullerton, 2000; Folz and Giles, 2002), and subscription-base”