Pitfalls of liver stiffness measurement: A 5‐year prospective study of 13,369 examinations
By Laurent Castéra, J. Foucher, P. Bernard, F. Carvalho, D. Allaix, Wassil Merrouche, P. Couzigou, V. de Lédinghen. Hepatology, 2010
1,168 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Epidemiology, Hepatology
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/4268870e224be770bcdc6f65cb6785800afc4e35
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Epidemiology
In Hepatology
Citations in the corpus
- WFUMB guidelines and recommendations for clinical use of ultrasound elastography: Part 3: liver. (2015, background): “Updating this experience with more than 13,000 examinations in 7,261 patients seen over a 5 years period, failure to obtain any measurement was observed in 4% of examinations and unreliable results in 17% (Castera et al. 2010).”
- EASL-ALEH Clinical Practice Guidelines: Non-invasive tests for evaluation of liver disease severity and prognosis. (2015, background): “8% [58], mostly due to patient obesity or limited operator experience.”
- Magnetic Resonance Imaging More Accurately Classifies Steatosis and Fibrosis in Patients With Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease Than Transient Elastography. (2016, background): “Other authors have suggested that a high BMI or large amount of ascites cause the failure of TE [46-48].”