Perception Test: A Diagnostic Benchmark for Multimodal Video Models

By Viorica Puatruaucean, Lucas Smaira, Ankush Gupta, Adrià Recasens Continente, Larisa Markeeva, Dylan Banarse, Skanda Koppula, Joseph Heyward, Mateusz Malinowski, Yezhou Yang and 14 more. Neural Information Processing Systems, 2023

350 citations recorded by the source corpus.

We propose a novel multimodal video benchmark - the Perception Test - to evaluate the perception and reasoning skills of pre-trained multimodal models (e.g. Flamingo, SeViLA, or GPT-4). Compared to existing benchmarks that focus on computational tasks (e.g. classification, detection or tracking), the Perception Test focuses on skills (Memory, Abstraction, Physics, Semantics) and types of reasoning (descriptive, explanatory, predictive, counterfactual) across video, audio, and text modalities, to provide a comprehensive and efficient evaluation tool. The benchmark probes pre-trained models for their transfer capabilities, in a zero-shot / few-shot or limited finetuning regime. For these purposes, the Perception Test introduces 11.6k real-world videos, 23s average length, designed to show perceptually interesting situations, filmed by around 100 participants worldwide. The videos are densely annotated with six types of labels (multiple-choice and grounded video question-answers, object and point tracks, temporal action and sound segments), enabling both language and non-language evaluations. The fine-tuning and validation splits of the benchmark are publicly available (CC-BY license), in addition to a challenge server with a held-out test split. Human baseline results compared to state-of-the-art video QA models show a substantial gap in performance (91.4% vs 46.2%), suggesting that there is significant room for improvement in multimodal video understanding. Dataset, baseline code, and challenge server are available at https://github.com/deepmind/perception_test

Subfields: Artificial Intelligence, Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/42585728685d7b2567e62b03463d1520f1bbe47e

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Artificial Intelligence

  1. Yu Qiao
  2. Limin Wang
  3. Yali Wang
  4. Ziwei Liu
  5. Kunchang Li
  6. Yi Wang
  7. Yinan He
  8. Bo Li

In Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition

  1. Yu Qiao
  2. Luc Van Gool
  3. Xiaogang Wang
  4. Limin Wang
  5. Ming-Hsuan Yang
  6. Dacheng Tao
  7. Ziwei Liu
  8. Andrew Zisserman

Citations in the corpus