Interpreting genotype × environment interactions for durum wheat grain yields using nonparametric methods

By R. Mohammadi, A. Abdulahi, R. Haghparast, M. Armion. Euphytica, 2007

101 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Comparison of parametric and non-parametric methods for selecting stable and adapted durum wheat genotypes in variable environments (2008, background): “Common wheat cultivation is still more profitable despite a price premium of 6% for durum grain (Mohammadi et al. 2007).”
AMMI stability value and simultaneous estimation of yield and yield stability in bread wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) (2011, background): “…se should however not be the only parameter for selection, because the most stable genotypes would not necessarily give the best yield performance (Mohammadi et al., 2007; Mohammadi and Amri, 2008), hence there is a need for approaches that incorporate both mean yield and stability in a single…”
Use of AMMI and other stability statistics in the simultaneous selection of rice genotypes for yield and stability under direct-seeded conditions (2014, background): “On the other hand, same sign or near zero scores represent a non-crossover (quantitative) GEI or a proportionate genotype response (Mohammadi et al., 2007; Mohammadi and Amri, 2008; Farshadfar, 2008).”