Self-Normalizing Neural Networks

By Günter Klambauer, Thomas Unterthiner, Andreas Mayr, Sepp Hochreiter. 2017

2,892 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Deep Learning has revolutionized vision via convolutional neural networks (CNNs) and natural language processing via recurrent neural networks (RNNs). However, success stories of Deep Learning with standard feed-forward neural networks (FNNs) are rare. FNNs that perform well are typically shallow and, therefore cannot exploit many levels of abstract representations. We introduce self-normalizing neural networks (SNNs) to enable high-level abstract representations. While batch normalization requires explicit normalization, neuron activations of SNNs automatically converge towards zero mean and unit variance. The activation function of SNNs are "scaled exponential linear units" (SELUs), which induce self-normalizing properties. Using the Banach fixed-point theorem, we prove that activations close to zero mean and unit variance that are propagated through many network layers will converge towards zero mean and unit variance -- even under the presence of noise and perturbations. This convergence property of SNNs allows to (1) train deep networks with many layers, (2) employ strong regularization, and (3) to make learning highly robust. Furthermore, for activations not close to unit variance, we prove an upper and lower bound on the variance, thus, vanishing and exploding gradients are impossible. We compared SNNs on (a) 121 tasks from the UCI machine learning repository, on (b) drug discovery benchmarks, and on (c) astronomy tasks with standard FNNs and other machine learning methods such as random forests and support vector machines. SNNs significantly outperformed all competing FNN methods at 121 UCI tasks, outperformed all competing methods at the Tox21 dataset, and set a new record at an astronomy data set. The winning SNN architectures are often very deep. Implementations are available at: this http URL.

Subfields: Artificial Intelligence, Materials Chemistry, Model Architectures, Optimization & Training

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Artificial Intelligence

  1. Quoc V. Le
  2. Mohit Bansal
  3. Yoshua Bengio
  4. Sergey Levine
  5. Jianfeng Gao
  6. Percy Liang
  7. Luke S. Zettlemoyer
  8. Ruslan Salakhutdinov

In Materials Chemistry

  1. Charles Siegel
  2. Nathan Oken Hodas
  3. Abhinav Vishnu
  4. Garrett B. Goh
  5. Sepp Hochreiter
  6. Thomas Unterthiner
  7. Günter Klambauer
  8. Wojciech Samek

In Model Architectures

  1. Quoc V. Le
  2. Yoshua Bengio
  3. Jiashi Feng
  4. Shuicheng Yan
  5. Barret Zoph
  6. Kyunghyun Cho
  7. Alan L. Yuille
  8. Ruslan Salakhutdinov

In Optimization & Training

  1. Quoc V. Le
  2. Soham De
  3. Samuel L. Smith
  4. Frank Hutter
  5. Karen Simonyan
  6. Yoshua Bengio
  7. Barret Zoph
  8. Andrew Brock

Citations in the corpus