Camera Trapping of Carnivores: Trap Success Among Camera Types and Across Species, and Habitat Selection by Species, on Salt Pond Mountain, Giles County, Virginia

By M. Kelly, Erika L. Holub. 2008

275 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Ecology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/424556b052d3d484a76a714913b8b98abccea1db

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Ecology

Citations in the corpus

Camera trapping photographic rate as an index of density in forest ungulates (2009, background): “This study, however, by pooling different species, didnot control for the likely variations in trapping rates associated with factors such as different body size (Kelly & Holub 2008; Tobler et al. 2008), trail use (Trolle & Kéry 2003) and daily range (Rowcliffe et al. 2008; Tobler et al. 2008).”
Influence of camera-trap sampling design on mammal species capture rates and community structures in southeastern Brazil (2013, background): “…that 55 Influence of sampling design on mammal inventory Biota Neotrop., vol. 13, no. 2 influence, it might be difficult to distinguish whether the variation in the number of records in a given survey is due to differences in trapping success among species or among the cameras (Kelly & Holub 2008).”
Towards good practice guidance in using camera‐traps in ecology: influence of sampling design on validity of ecological inferences (2013, methodology): “…camera-traps with other sampling methods (Silveira, Jacomo &Diniz-Filho 2003; Rovero &Marshall 2009; De Bondi et al. 2010; Janecka et al. 2011), whereas others focused on comparing different camera types and their efficiency in trapping animals (Kelly & Holub 2008; Swann, Kawanishi & Palmer 2011).”
Cat coexistence in central Sumatra: ecological characteristics, spatial and temporal overlap, and implications for management (2015, methodology): “We extracted habitat variables from a 500-m radius surrounding each camera station from a geographic information system (GIS) similar to other studies (Kelly & Holub, 2008; Davis, Kelly & Stauffer, 2011).”
Spatial and Temporal Structure of a Mesocarnivore Guild in Midwestern North America (2015, background): “That gray foxes use forsted habitats has been repeatedly reported (Chamberlain and Leopold 2000, Riley 2006, Kelly and Holub 2008, Temple et al. 2010, Cooper et al. 2012), but few studies assessed multiple scal of selection simultaneously.”
A comparison of the effectiveness of camera trapping and live trapping for sampling terrestrial small-mammal communities (2010, background): “To minimise false triggering and allow for unobstructed photographs, dense vegetation within the camera’s field of view was cleared (Kelly and Holub 2008).”
Design, evaluate, refine: camera trap studies for elusive species (2008, background): “Recent studies have shown that animal size can impact photo rates (Kelly & Holub, 2008; Thompson et al., in press).”
Quantifying the sensitivity of camera traps: an adapted distance sampling approach (2011, background): “Sensitivity can also vary between camera models (Kelly & Holub 2008) and environmental conditions (no published sources that we are currently aware of).”
Carnivore co‐existence and habitat use in the Mountain Pine Ridge Forest Reserve, Belize (2011, unknown): “We obtained data layers of Belize containing the geographic locations of roads (updated in 2004), rivers and protected area boundaries (updated in 2005; Meerman, 2007), then, following Kelly & Holub (2008), we created 200m buffers encircling camera stations.”