Analysing the determinants of performance of best and worst European banks: A mixed logit approach

By Carlos Pestana Barros, Candida Ferreira, Jonathan M. Williams. 2007

177 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Accounting, Finance, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/423aaabee44a2d93028329f3e816b34f752988ed

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Accounting

1. Jitendra Mahakud
2. Neeraj J. Gupta
3. Yin-Hua Yeh
4. Chih-Liang Liu
5. Huimin Chung
6. Yong Tan

In Finance

1. Jitendra Mahakud
2. Neeraj J. Gupta
3. Yin-Hua Yeh
4. Chih-Liang Liu
5. Huimin Chung
6. Yong Tan

In Sociology and Political Science

1. Yin-Hua Yeh
2. Chih-Liang Liu
3. Huimin Chung

Citations in the corpus

• The impacts of risk and competition on bank profitability in China (2016, background): “On the other hand, Barros et al. (2007) argue that the asymmetric information problems associated with leading can be reduced by smaller and specialized banks, preceding a negative impact of size on bank profitability.”
• What Determines the Profitability of Banks? Evidence from Spain (2013, unknown): “…assets and profitability —or, similarly, an inverse relationship between liquidity and profitability— are Abreu and Mendes (2002), Angbazo (1997), Barros et al. (2007), Chiorazzo et al. (2008), DeYoung and Rice (2004), Goddard et al. (2004a), Iannotta et al. (2007), Molyneux and Thornton…”
• Ownership, bank size, capitalization and bank performance: Evidence from India (2020, background): “On the other hand, the opposing view is that an increase in bank size leads to higher levels of marketing, operational, asymmetric information and bureaucratic costs, and results in a negative link between profitability and size (Barros et al., 2007; Tan, 2016; Djalilov & Piesse, 2016).”
• Committee Independence and Financial Institution Performance During the 2007–08 Credit Crunch: Evidence from a Multi‐Country Study (2011, methodology): “…Firm Size Equity Ratio i 1 1 2 = + + + + α γ β β β β β β ε 3 4 5 6 i Current Ratio Subsidiaries Margin Diversity + + + + (1) Following Saunders and Schumacher (2000), Barros et al. (2007), Valverde and Fernandez (2007), Lin and Zhang (2009), and Berger, Hasan, and Zhou (2010), the control…”