FewCLUE: A Chinese Few-shot Learning Evaluation Benchmark

By Xiaojing Lu, Chenyang Yuan, Xuanwei Zhang, Huining Yuan, Huilin Xu, Guoao Wei, Xiang Pan, Hai Hu. 2021

59 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Pretrained Language Models (PLMs) have achieved tremendous success in natural language understanding tasks. While different learning schemes -- fine-tuning, zero-shot, and few-shot learning -- have been widely explored and compared for languages such as English, there is comparatively little work in Chinese to fairly and comprehensively evaluate and compare these methods and thus hinders cumulative progress. In this paper, we introduce the Chinese Few-shot Learning Evaluation Benchmark (FewCLUE), the first comprehensive few-shot evaluation benchmark in Chinese. It includes nine tasks, ranging from single-sentence and sentence-pair classification tasks to machine reading comprehension tasks. We systematically evaluate five state-of-the-art (SOTA) few-shot learning methods (including PET, ADAPET, LM-BFF, P-tuning and EFL), and compare their performance with fine-tuning and zero-shot learning schemes on the newly constructed FewCLUE benchmark. Experimental results reveal that: 1) The effect of different few-shot learning methods is sensitive to the pre-trained model to which the methods are applied; 2) PET and P-tuning achieve the best overall performance with RoBERTa and ERNIE respectively. Our benchmark is used in the few-shot learning contest of NLPCC 2021. In addition, we provide a user-friendly toolkit, as well as an online leaderboard to help facilitate further progress on Chinese few-shot learning. We provide a baseline performance on different learning methods, a reference for future research.

Subfields: Artificial Intelligence, Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Evaluation & Benchmarks

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Artificial Intelligence

  1. Jie Tang
  2. Hinrich Schütze
  3. Xiao Liu
  4. Ming Ding
  5. Timo Schick
  6. Graham Neubig
  7. Minlie Huang
  8. Luke S. Zettlemoyer

In Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition

  1. Timo Schick
  2. Hinrich Schütze
  3. Ming Ding
  4. Jie Tang
  5. Zhilin Yang
  6. Ajit Rajasekharan
  7. Sivanesan Sangeetha
  8. Katikapalli Subramanyam Kalyan

In Evaluation & Benchmarks

  1. Ajit Rajasekharan
  2. Sivanesan Sangeetha
  3. Katikapalli Subramanyam Kalyan
  4. Timo Schick
  5. Shuohuan Wang
  6. W. Tam
  7. Haifeng Wang
  8. Hinrich Schütze

Citations in the corpus