Inequality and market concentration, when shareholding is more skewed than consumption

By Joshua S. Gans, Andrew Leigh, Martin C. Schmalz, A. Triggs. Oxford review of economic policy, 2018

198 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Economic theory suggests that monopoly prices hurt consumers but benefit shareholders. But in a world where individuals or households can be both consumers and shareholders, the impact of market power on inequality depends in part on the relative distribution of consumption and corporate equity ownership across individuals or households. The paper calculates this distribution for the United States, using data from the Survey of Consumer Finances and the Consumer Expenditure Survey, spanning nearly three decades from 1989 to 2016. In 2016, the top 20 per cent consumed approximately as much as the bottom 60 per cent, but had 15 times as much corporate equity. Because ownership is more skewed than consumption, increased mark-ups increase inequality. Moreover, over time, corporate equity has become even more skewed relative to consumption.

Subfields: Accounting, Economics and Econometrics, Finance

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/4237566f9a760f4c5e040d192f23d86c74442340

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Accounting

In Economics and Econometrics

Citations in the corpus

Consequences of forced migration: A survey of recent findings (2019, background): “The distance to geographically available border crossings (Del Carpio and Wagner, 2015; Akgündüz et al., 2018), pre-existing networks of the affected migrant group in the receiving area (Morales, 2018), or the degree of violence in migrants’ home region (Calderón-Mejía and Ibáñez, 2016) have been…”