Reproductive promiscuity in the splendid fairy-wren: effects of group size and auxiliary reproduction
By M. Webster, K. A. Tarvin, E. Tuttle, S. Pruett-Jones. 2004
114 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Ecology, Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/4232acd7d988cd2bccf39946b809b2c3a82726b5
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Ecology
In Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics
In Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
Citations in the corpus
- Extrapair Paternity and Sexual Selection in Socially Monogamous Birds: Are Tropical Birds Different? (2008, background): “…of auxiliary helpers may reduce constraints on females, and possibly also fitness consequences for males, which may explain why the presence of helpers appears to affect EPP rates in some species of fairy-wren (Mulder et al�� 1994, Webster et al�� 2004)�� Finally, experimental approaches can…”
- Coordination between the sexes for territorial defence in a duetting fairy-wren (2008, unknown): “…than a month before breeding started and we broadcast duets to avoid simulating solitary intruders that might be prospecting for extrapair mating opportunities (since both sister species of purple-crowned fairy-wrens have high levels of extrapair paternity, Mulder et al. 1994; Webster et al. 2004).”
- Plumage color and reproduction in the red-backed fairy-wren: Why be a dull breeder? (2008, methodology): “References for microsatellite primers are as follows: All Mcy loci from Double et al. (1997), Msp primers from Webster et al. (2004), Ase9 from Richardson et al. (2000), Cuu28 from Gibbs et al. (1999), and Phtr3 from Fridolfsson et al. (1997). a Significantly different from expected,…”
- Genetic similarity of social mates predicts the level of extrapair paternity in splendid fairy-wrens (2005, methodology): “We used the program Cervus 1.0 (Marshall et al. 1998), which utilizes a maximum-likelihood approach to assign paternity (for full details on paternity analyses, see Webster et al. 2004).”