Canadian evidence on ten years of universal preschool policies: The good and the bad
By C. Haeck, P. Lefèbvre, P. Merrigan. 2015
123 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Education, Gender Studies
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/42313c49fbb7da7425f7f90dcb5b7311ff5f86d3
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Education
In Gender Studies
Citations in the corpus
- Do children benefit from universal early childhood education and care? A meta-analysis of evidence from natural experiments (2018, background): “Excluding these studies (25 estimates; Haeck et al., 2013; Havnes & Mogstad, 2010; Felfe et al., 2012) has almost no impact on our estimates.”
- The Long-Run Impacts of a Universal Child Care Program (2019, unknown): “This result, while consistent with Haeck, Lefebvre, and Merrigan (2015), is different than the estimate in Baker, Gruber, and Milligan (2008), which used a different age range.20 The results in Table 1 demonstrate that the main conclusions of Baker, Gruber, and Milligan (2008) for young children of…”
- Children and the Remaining Gender Gaps in the Labor Market (2020, unknown): “For example, the universal Pre-K programs in the U.S. typically apply only to children aged 4 years old and covers childcare of at most 6 hours per day, compared to 12 hours per day in the case of the Quebec policy (Haeck et al., 2015).”