Analysis of Incomplete Data Using Inverse Probability Weighting and Doubly Robust Estimators
By Stijn Vansteelandt, James R. Carpenter, Michael G. Kenward. 2010
98 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Statistics and Probability
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/4227e4782dcaaa6c53ff703d44bfe08179d275b8
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Statistics and Probability
Citations in the corpus
- Causal mediation analysis for stochastic interventions (2019, unknown): “(Carpenter et al., 2006; Vansteelandt et al., 2010; Seaman et al., 2012).”
- Combining Multiple Imputation and Inverse-Probability Weighting (2012, background): “However, the fit of the missingness model, which is a model for a univariate response, is easier to assess, and more able to be assessed (Vansteelandt, Carpenter, and Kenward, 2010), than that of a complex multivariate imputation model.”
- On model selection and model misspecification in causal inference (2012, unknown): “Robins and Ritov(47) underscored more formally the importance of using information on the exposure distribution in causal inference by demonstrating that, due to the curse of dimensionality, likelihood-based procedures fail to estimate treatment effects in randomised experiments where randomisation ”
- Review of inverse probability weighting for dealing with missing data (2013, methodology): “AIPW is more complicated to apply in standard software and we describe it here only briefly; Vansteelandt et al.4 provide an accessible introduction.”