EPPI-Reviewer 3.5: software for research synthesis

By James Thomas, J. Brunton. 2007

381 citations recorded by the source corpus.

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/421df3f66524010228cff4197dda8ee4ff7d97c1

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

1. G. Tsafnat
2. A. Dunn
3. M. K. Choong
4. P. Glasziou
5. Filippo Galgani
6. Enrico W. Coiera
7. Nina Arya
8. M. Foster

Citations in the corpus

• Natural language processing systems for capturing and standardizing unstructured clinical information: A systematic review (2017, methodology): “We used the EPPI-Reviewer (version 4) software [11] produced by the EPPI-Centre at University College London to manage many of the screening and coding processes of our systematic review process.”
• Systematic review automation technologies (2014, background): “Existing commercial decision support systems are focused on helping reviewers manage inclusion and exclusion decisions, flag disagreements between reviewers and resolve them sometimes automatically [99-101].”