Guidelines for quality control of commercially produced natural enmies

By C. LenterenvanJ., A. Hale, J. Klapwijk, J. Scheltvan, S. Steinberg. 2003

126 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Insect Science, Molecular Biology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/4219e44b8fa8db081fbe16e90ae482f05706d827

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Insect Science

1. Suzanne T. E. Lommen
2. E. Riddick
3. P. W. Jong
4. B. Pannebakker

In Molecular Biology

1. E. Riddick

Citations in the corpus

• Benefits and limitations of factitious prey and artificial diets on life parameters of predatory beetles, bugs, and lacewings: a mini-review (2009, background): “Most of these life parameters have been used to evaluate the quality of commercially-produced predators (Penn et al. 1998; Grenier and De Clercq 2003; van Lenteren et al. 2003a; Callebaut et al. 2004).”
• It is time to bridge the gap between exploring and exploiting: prospects for utilizing intraspecific genetic variation to optimize arthropods for augmentative pest control – a review (2017, background): “Advanced quality control procedures include measuring multiple fitness components of the reared individuals, allowing the swift detection of qualitative flaws (van Lenteren et al., 2003; Leppla, 2003).”