The Temporary Assistance for Needy Families Program
By Robert A. Moffitt. 2002
185 citations recorded by the source corpus.
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/4219d39e0d92c8bc6be9c20a17e6f36df4a6fd9c
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
- Richard Blundell
- Giovanni L. Violante
- A. Shephard
- Nicola Pavoni
- Thomas Lemieux
- Kevin Milligan
- David H. Autor
- Greg Kaplan
Citations in the corpus
- Incentive effects of social assistance: A regression discontinuity approach (2008, background): “For example, the impetus for many of the changes to welfare programmes in the United States since 1967 was a concern about disincentives to work embedded in the programmes ( Moffitt, 2003 ).”
- Employment, Hours of Work and the Optimal Taxation of Low Income Families (2008, methodology): “They are also used in the design of work conditioned earnings supplements, for example in the Canadian Self-Sufficiency Project (Card and Robins, 1998) and in the TANF programme of welfare payment in the US (Moffitt, 2003).”
- Optimal Welfare-to-Work Programs (2007, methodology): “…literature on the evaluation of active labor market programs (for surveys, see LaLonde, 1995; Meyer, 1995; Heckman, LaLonde and Smith, 1999; Moffitt, 2003) which provides useful guidance on the effectiveness of different types of interventions, but cannot address the complex question of…”
- An Assessment of the Effectiveness of Anti-Poverty Programs in the United States. Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research (2011, unknown): “However, the early work on the issue showed evidence of a small effect (Moffitt, 1998, 2003b), while extensive studies of the effects of welfare reform (Blank, 2002; Grogger and Karoly, 2005) likewise have shown little effect on such outcomes.”