Integral geometry and the Gauss-Bonnet theorem in constant curvature spaces
By G. Solanes. 2005
64 citations recorded by the source corpus.
We give an integral-geometric proof of the Gauss-Bonnet theorem for hypersurfaces in constant curvature spaces. As a tool, we obtain variation formulas in integral geometry with interest in its own.
Subfields: Applied Mathematics, Astronomy and Astrophysics, Geometry and Topology
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/420f7867dcd6a057e218bdc5c69ab57c1b9de3c8
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Applied Mathematics
In Astronomy and Astrophysics
In Geometry and Topology
Citations in the corpus
- Integral geometry of complex space forms (2012, methodology): “Proposition 3 in [Sol06] remains true, without change, in complex space forms.”
- Rigidity results, inverse curvature flows and Alexandrov-Fenchel type inequalities in the sphere (2013, background): “In S we have the following definition of the quermassintegrals, compare [24] (also for a more detailed definition of the measure dLk): 7.”
- Isoperimetric type problems and Alexandrov-Fenchel type inequalities in the hyperbolic space (2013, methodology): “Curvature integrals and Quermassintegrals In this section, we recall some basic concepts in integral geometry in the hyperbolic space, we refer to Santaló’s book [35], Part IV, and Solanes’ thesis [39] for more details.”
- Volume preserving flow and Alexandrov–Fenchel type inequalities in hyperbolic space (2018, unknown): “Recall that for a convex domain Ω in hyperbolic space, the quermassintegral Wk(Ω) is defined as follows (see [26,27]): 1 Wk(Ω) = ωk−1 · · ·ω0 ωn−1 · · ·ωn−k ∫ Lk χ(Lk ∩ Ω)dLk, k = 1, · · · , n, (1.”
- Hyperbolic Alexandrov-Fenchel quermassintegral inequalities II (2013, background): “ ∩Ω)dL, where Lr is the space of r-dimensional totally geodesic subspaces L in Hn, ωr is the area of the r-dimensional standard round sphere and dL is the natural (invariant) measure on Lr (cf. [24], [28]). As in the Euclidean case we take W0(Ω) = Vol(Ω). With these definitions, unlike the euclidean ”