Normalizing Flows on Riemannian Manifolds
By Mevlana Gemici, Danilo Jimenez Rezende, Shakir Mohamed. 2016
120 citations recorded by the source corpus.
We consider the problem of density estimation on Riemannian manifolds. Density estimation on manifolds has many applications in fluid-mechanics, optics and plasma physics and it appears often when dealing with angular variables (such as used in protein folding, robot limbs, gene-expression) and in general directional statistics. In spite of the multitude of algorithms available for density estimation in the Euclidean spaces $\mathbf{R}^n$ that scale to large n (e.g. normalizing flows, kernel methods and variational approximations), most of these methods are not immediately suitable for density estimation in more general Riemannian manifolds. We revisit techniques related to homeomorphisms from differential geometry for projecting densities to sub-manifolds and use it to generalize the idea of normalizing flows to more general Riemannian manifolds. The resulting algorithm is scalable, simple to implement and suitable for use with automatic differentiation. We demonstrate concrete examples of this method on the n-sphere $\mathbf{S}^n$.
Subfields: Artificial Intelligence, Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Statistical and Nonlinear Physics
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Artificial Intelligence
- Yoshua Bengio
- Sergey Levine
- Ruslan Salakhutdinov
- Aaron C. Courville
- Nicola De Cao
- Max Welling
- Mohit Bansal
- Yee Whye Teh
In Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition
- Luc Van Gool
- Dacheng Tao
- Trevor Darrell
- Ming-Hsuan Yang
- Andrew Zisserman
- Jitendra Malik
- Bernt Schiele
- Xiaogang Wang
In Statistical and Nonlinear Physics
- Aaron C. Courville
- Nicola De Cao
- Chin-Wei Huang
- J. Tomczak
- Arnaud Doucet
- Alexandre Lacoste
- David Krueger
- Marcus A. Brubaker
Citations in the corpus
- Equivariant Hamiltonian Flows (2019, background): “But it remains a challenge to embed flow-based models with domain knowledge such as data on specific manifolds [6] and known symmetries or factorisation of the target density.”
- Neural Autoregressive Flows (2018, background): “There Finally, there are also several works which develop new techniques for constructing NFs that are orthogonal to ours (Tomczak & Welling, 2017; 2016; Gemici et al., 2016; Du-venaud et al., 2016; Berg et al., 2018).”
- Refining Deep Generative Models via Discriminator Gradient Flow (2020, unknown): “If Jg has full column rank and g is an injective function, then we have the following change-of-variables equation (Ben-Israel, 1999; Gemici et al., 2016), ∫ X f(x)dx = ∫ Z (f ◦ g)(z) √ detJ>g Jg(z)dz.”
- Hyperspherical Variational Auto-Encoders (2018, background): “In (Gemici et al., 2016) a first attempt is made to extend normalizing flows to Riemannian manifolds.”
- Normalizing Flows: An Introduction and Review of Current Methods (2020, background): “Modelling probability distributions on manifolds has applications in many fields including robotics, molecular biology, optics, fluid mechanics, and plasma physics [30], [79].”
- Riemannian Score-Based Generative Modeling (2022, methodology): “Additionally, we consider a standard SGM on the 2D plane followed by the inverse stereographic projection which induces a density on the sphere (Gemici et al., 2016).”