Predicting epidemics on directed contact networks.
By Lauren Ancel Meyers, Mark Newman, B. Pourbohloul. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 2006
300 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Modeling and Simulation, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Statistical and Nonlinear Physics
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/41e5a0c785ce3bc6349a7b4fae08d2689a7cb05f
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Modeling and Simulation
In Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
In Statistical and Nonlinear Physics
- Timothy C. Reluga
- Chayant Tantipathananandh
- David Kempe
- Tanya Y. Berger-Wolf
- Bryan T. Grenfell
- Lauren Ancel Meyers
- Shweta Bansal
- Jure Leskovec
Citations in the corpus
- A framework for community identification in dynamic social networks (2007, background): “Social networks have attracted a large amount of attention from epidemiologists [21, 25, 28], sociologists [5, 29, 38], biologists (animal interactions) [7, 6, 10, 30, 36], the intelligence community (terrorism networks) [3, 23, 24], and more recently also from computer scientists [1, 11, 14, 17, 18”
- Game Theory of Social Distancing in Response to an Epidemic (2010, result): “Thus, the simple epidemic model is often considered as a worst-casescenario, when compared with more complex network models [29,30] and agent-based models [31–33].”
- When individual behaviour matters: homogeneous and network models in epidemiology (2007, background): “They provide excellent final-state predictions, but do not predict the dynamics of an outbreak (Moore & Newman 2000; Newman 2002; Meyers et al. 2003, 2005, 2006).”