Reducing ambiguity in describing plant-insect interactions: "preference", "acceptability" and "electivity".

By M. Singer. 2000

100 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Insect Science, Nature and Landscape Conservation

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/41cf24faad9e91ec87efd1ebc81fb95baccbc23e

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics

1. Sandra Díaz
2. J. H. C. Cornelissen
3. N. Pérez‐Harguindeguy
4. D. Gurvich
5. Marcelo R. Cabido
6. S. Lavorel
7. Francesco de Bello
8. R. Pakeman

In Insect Science

1. J. H. C. Cornelissen
2. Sandra Díaz
3. Marcelo R. Cabido

In Nature and Landscape Conservation

1. Sandra Díaz
2. D. Gurvich
3. J. H. C. Cornelissen
4. S. Lavorel
5. Marcelo R. Cabido
6. N. Pérez‐Harguindeguy
7. Eric Garnier
8. Francesco de Bello

Citations in the corpus

• Leaf traits and herbivore selection in the field and in cafeteria experiments (2003, background): “Despite the vast diversity and complexity of herbivores, plants, and their interactions, most authors agree that a small number of components of leaf quality affect preference by generalist herbivores in a predictable way (Feeny 1990; Herms & Mattson 1992; Singer 2000 ).”