A comparison of the tensile, fatigue, and fracture behavior of Ti–6Al–4V and 15-5 PH stainless steel parts made by selective laser melting

308 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Assembly Based Methods to Support Product Innovation in Design for Additive Manufacturing: An Exploratory Case Study (2015, unknown): “Restrictive DFAM methods aim to take into account the limits of AM, such as usable materials and their properties [45,51,54], the performance and characteristics of AM machines [53], or product manufacturability [42].”
Additive manufacturing of steels: a review of achievements and challenges (2020, background): “AM material has been shown to have * 34% greater UTS of 830 MPa at 593 C but over 50% lower ductility, at 9% elongation to failure, than the wrought material [121, 122].”
Selective Laser Melting of Duplex Stainless Steel Powders: An Investigation (2016, background): “Of the five classes of stainless steels, mainly austenitic 316 L [15] and precipitation hardening 15–5 [17] and 17–4 [18] stainless steels attained further research attention applying SLM.”