Corruption, Manufacturing Plant Growth, and the Asian Paradox: Indonesian Evidence

By V. Vial, Julien Hanoteau. 2010

226 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Greasing the wheels? The impact of regulations and corruption on firm entry (2011, unknown): “Evidence from Indonesia has already been alluded to in the introduction, for example (Vial and Hanoteau 2010).”
Does Political Corruption Impede Firm Innovation? Evidence from the United States (2019, background): “Several studies show that corruption promotes efficiency by helping firms cut through bureaucratic red tape (Leff (1964), Leys (1965), Lui (1985), Vial and Hanoteau (2010), and Mironov (2015)).”
Corruption and bank risk-taking: Evidence from emerging economies (2015, unknown): “Although corruption is found positively associated with the growth in some newly industrializing Asian countries (Rock and Bonnett, 2004; Vial and Hanoteau, 2010), our finding suggests no “Asian paradox” in their banking sector and the beneficial effect of corruption on growth might be at the cost…”
Greasing the Wheels of Change: Bribery, Institutions, and New Product Introductions in Emerging Markets (2019, background): “Moreover, using these average values for instrumentation mitigates also potential measurement errors associated with bribes, given firms’ reluctance to report such payments (Vial & Hanoteau, 2010).”
Drivers of Entrepreneurship and Post-Entry Performance of Newborn Firms in Developing Countries (2014, unknown): “Paying bribes may therefore be less costly than compliance (see also Vial and Hanoteau 2010).”