A SEVEN-YEAR COMPARISON OF RELATIVE-ABUNDANCE AND DISTANCE-SAMPLING METHODS

By R. Norvell, F. Howe, J. Parrish. 2003

174 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Ecology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/4164b5dd8b22f37fc089840ea2120f181c2ed835

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Ecology

Citations in the corpus

An invasive‐native mammalian species replacement process captured by camera trap survey random encounter models (2016, background): “…(Buckland et al. 1993) is a popular method of surveying mammals, commonly used to estimate population densities in a wide variety of taxa, e.g., the red fox Vulpes vulpes (Ruette et al. 2003), rodents (Parmenter et al. 2003), primates (Marshall et al. 2008), and birds (Norvell et al. 2003).”
POINT-TRANSECT SURVEYS FOR SONGBIRDS: ROBUST METHODOLOGIES (2006, background): “Norvell et al. (2003) found that detectabilities of birds recorded on point counts varied three- to fi ve-fold, and they concluded that population trends based on point-count data were unstable and did not allow reliable inference.”
In Defense of Indices: The Case of Bird Surveys (2008, background): “…1995; Thompson et al. 1998; Nichols et al. 2000; Anderson 2001, 2003; Williams et al. 2001; Yoccoz et al. 2001; Farnsworth et al. 2002, 2005; MacKenzie and Kendall 2002; Rosenstock et al. 2002; Ellingson and Lukacs 2003; Norvell et al. 2003; White 2005; Buckland 2006; Kissling and Garton 2006).”
IMPROVING ESTIMATES OF BIRD DENSITY USING MULTIPLE- COVARIATE DISTANCE SAMPLING (2007, background): “Observer diff erences are well documented in bird surveys (e.g., Diefenbach et al. 2003, Norvell et al. 2003), and our example has once again demonstrated the importance of accounting for such diff erences if comparisons are to be made between estimates collected by diff erent fi eld teams.”
ESTIMATING DETECTION PROBABILITY AND DENSITY FROM POINT-COUNT SURVEYS: A COMBINATION OF DISTANCE AND DOUBLE-OBSERVER SAMPLING (2006, background): “…of unadjusted point counts have long been recognized (Barker and Sauer 1995, Rosenstock et al. 2002, Thompson 2002, Diefenbach et al. 2003, Norvell et al. 2003, Farnsworth et al. 2005, and others), and our results further substantiate recommendations to abandon their use for estimating…”
EXPERIMENTAL ANALYSIS OF THE AUDITORY DETECTION PROCESS ON AVIAN POINT COUNTS (2007, background): “Trends in other factors affecting detection probabilities, such as observers or habitat conditions, can impart similar biases (Sauer et al. 1994, Norvell et al. 2003).”